FT Executive Education Rankings 2020: methodology and key

This is the 22nd edition of the Money Times rankings of the world’s foremost providers of customised and open-enrolment government education programmes.

The customised rating options the top 85 small business schools — these are programs personalized to the training requires of the organisations that fee them. The next rating comprises the top 75 schools for open-enrolment programmes — programs on unique matters, these kinds of as leadership, that are directed in direction of gurus no matter of their employer. A third, blended rating lists the top fifty schools for government education, calculated from the customised and open tables.

Schools having section will have to be internationally accredited by both Equis or AACSB and have gained revenues of at least $2m in 2019 from both their customised or open-enrolment non-degree programmes. This year, a total of 107 schools took section in both or both equally rankings.

The rating of customised program providers is compiled making use of data from the small business schools and their company clients in 2019. Just about every school will have to nominate a minimum of twenty clients. At least 5 of them will have to complete the FT survey for a school to be eligible for the final rating.

The FT survey was done by 1,a hundred thirty five small business school clients this yr — a reaction charge of 56 for each cent. Just about every rated their programme on a 10-point scale according to a range of indicators. Their responses directly inform the initial 10 of the ranking’s standards, from program style to comply with-up and foreseeable future use, which account for a blended eighty for each cent of the ranking’s fat.

Consumer responses are weighted according to programme form. Clients decide on one of a few options to categorise their programme: strategic (shipped to top management and made to impact a company’s route) typical (shipped to management on operational areas of a company) or functional (associated to a unique functionality, these kinds of as marketing and advertising). Strategic programmes have the largest weighting and hence the best effects on the rating.

Responses are also weighted according to the seniority of the personal responsible for specifying the program, the size of the consumer organisation and the number of schools with which that consumer has commissioned customised programs in the earlier a few many years.

The final 5 standards are calculated from information offered by schools on international clients, overseas programmes, advancement, associate schools and faculty range.

The open-enrolment rating is compiled making use of data from program providers and people today who done their nominated management programmes in 2019. Schools post one or two typical programs of at least a few days in length and one or two highly developed programs of at least 5 days. At least twenty for each cent of these programmes’ individuals will have to complete the FT survey, with a minimum of twenty done surveys, for a school to be regarded in the final rating.

A total of five,480 individuals answered this year’s open programme survey — a reaction charge of 37 for each cent — ranking components of their program on a 10-point scale. Responses by highly developed and typical-stage individuals are blended to estimate the initial 10 rating standards.

These standards, which include things like the quality of the individuals, of the educating and the relevance of the competencies they gained, inform eighty for each cent of the rating. Faculty data are applied to estimate the remaining standards on female and international individuals, advancement, international locale and associate schools.

For both equally rankings, information gathered in the previous two many years is applied, the place obtainable, to estimate standards informed by consumer and participant responses. If a school has participated for the earlier a few many years, the weighting is forty:33:27, with 2020 data counting for forty for each cent. If two many years of information is obtainable, the weighting is fifty five:45, with 2020 data accounting for fifty five for each cent.

The weightings accorded to the initial 9 and 10 standards in the customised and open rankings, respectively, are established by the stage of worth clients and individuals connect to every single in their surveys for the 2020 rating. Weightings for these standards hence vary somewhat from yr to yr.

Schools that aspect in both equally rankings are eligible for the blended in general rating. The top fifty schools are calculated according to an equal weighting of the total scores accomplished in both equally rankings, fairly than an typical of rating positions.

Judith Pizer of Pizer-MacMillan acted as the FT’s databases consultant

Crucial: Customised-enrolment programme

(weights for rating standards are demonstrated in brackets as a percentage of the in general rating)

The initial 10 standards, up to and such as “Future use”, are centered on data from the corporations that commissioned government programs.

The next 5 are centered on data reported by small business schools. Schools are ranked for every single of these standards. The final classification, “Total responses‡”, is for information only and does not inform the rating.

Figures in brackets demonstrate the fat every single criterion contributes to the in general rating. The weighting accorded to the initial 9 standards, from preparing to worth for cash, accounts for eighty for each cent of the total ranking’s fat. It is established by the level of worth that clients connect to every single.

Preparation (eight.3): stage of conversation between consumer and school, the extent to which clients’ concepts ended up built-in into the programme, and the performance of the school in integrating its most up-to-date analysis.

Programme style (eight.4): overall flexibility of the program and the willingness of schools to complement their faculty with exterior experts.

Instructing techniques and materials (seven.9): extent to which educating techniques and resources ended up present-day and proper, and incorporated a suited mix of educational rigour and simple relevance.

School (eight.4): high quality of educating and the extent to which educating workers labored collectively to existing a coherent programme.

New competencies and learning (eight.3): relevance of competencies gained to the place of work, the simplicity with which they ended up applied, and the extent to which the course encouraged new means of thinking.

Observe-up (seven.3): extent and performance of comply with-up available immediately after the program individuals returned to their workplaces.

Aims accomplished (eight.4): extent to which educational and small business anticipations ended up achieved, and the high quality of comments from personal individuals to program commissioners.

Services (seven.4): ranking of the learning environment’s high quality and convenience, and of supporting resources and services.

Price for cash (seven.seven): clients’ ranking of the programme’s style, educating and resources in terms of worth for cash.

Potential use (eight.): likelihood that clients would reuse the similar school for other customised programmes in the foreseeable future, and no matter whether they would recommission the similar programme.

International clients (five.): centered on the percentage of clients with headquarters outside the house the small business school’s base region and region.

Abroad programmes (two.): international access of the school’s customised programme educating.

Development (five.): centered on the in general advancement in revenues from customised programmes as effectively as the advancement in revenues from repeat small business.

Companion schools (3.): quantity and high quality of programmes created or taught in conjunction with other Equis or Affiliation to Advance Collegiate Schools of Enterprise (AACSB) accredited small business schools.

School range (five.): range of school faculty according to citizenship and gender.

Overall responses: number of personal surveys done by the school’s clients. Figures in brackets point out the number of many years of survey data counted in direction of the rating.

Crucial: Open up-enrolment programme

(weights for rating standards are demonstrated in brackets as a percentage of the in general rating)

The initial 10 standards are centered on data from programme individuals the next six are centered on data submitted by the small business schools. Ranks are demonstrated for every single of these standards, apart from “Female participants”, which exhibits the percentage. Figures in brackets demonstrate the fat every single criterion contributes to the in general rating. The weighting accorded to the initial 10 standards, from preparing to services, accounts for eighty for each cent of the total ranking’s fat. It is established by the stage of worth that individuals attach to every single.

Preparation (seven.seven): provision of highly developed information on programme information, and the participant assortment approach.

Training course style (eight.six): overall flexibility of the program and appropriateness of course size, construction and style.

Instructing techniques and resources (eight.3): extent to which educating techniques and resources ended up present-day and proper, and incorporated a suited mix of educational rigour and simple relevance.

School (eight.seven): high quality of the educating and the extent to which educating workers labored collectively to existing a coherent programme.

High quality of individuals (seven.9): extent to which other individuals ended up of the proper managerial and educational common, the international range of individuals and the high quality of conversation amongst friends.

New competencies and learning (eight.seven): relevance of competencies gained to the place of work, the simplicity with which they ended up applied, and the extent to which the program encouraged new means of thinking.

Observe-up (seven.3): stage of comply with-up available immediately after individuals returned to their workplaces, and networking prospects with fellow individuals.

Aims accomplished (eight.4): extent to which personal and specialist anticipations ended up achieved, and the likelihood that individuals would advocate the programme.

Food and accommodation (six.eight): ranking of the high quality of meals and accommodation.

Services (seven.six): ranking of the learning environment’s high quality and convenience, and of supporting resources and services.

Female individuals (two.): percentage of female program individuals.

International individuals (3.): centered on the percentage of individuals from outside the house the small business school’s base region and region.

International locale (two.): extent to which programmes are operate outside the house the school’s base region and region.

Development (five.): centered on the in general advancement in revenues from open programmes as effectively as the advancement in revenues from repeat small business.

Companion schools (3.): quantity and high quality of programmes taught in conjunction with other Equis or AACSB accredited small business schools.

School range (five.): range of school faculty according to citizenship and gender.